Use
Use this to question a supplied eligibility extract. Do not use it to determine application eligibility or replace the full current call.
Turn a fictional eligibility extract into located questions, retaining undefined terms, separate awards and missing sponsor evidence for a human owner.
Use this to question a supplied eligibility extract. Do not use it to determine application eligibility or replace the full current call.
E1: "operating at least two years"; "managed one grant of 50,000 USD or more in the last three years"; "fiscal sponsor allowed." O1 registry: 2023-05-10; O2 website: founded 2022; O3 awards: 48,000 USD and 30,000 USD, dates absent. As-of 2026-11-15; owner director; sponsor unidentified.
| Exact term | Org fact | Evidence locator | Match status | Exception noted | Question for owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "operating at least two years" (Undefined: operating) | Registry/founding differ | E1;O1;O2 | Term undefined | None supplied | What establishes operating start? |
| "managed one grant of 50,000 USD or more in the last three years" (Defined: amount/window length) | Separate 48,000/30,000; dates absent | E1;O3 | Unsupported | Sponsor clause separate | What window anchor, award dates and management evidence apply? |
| "fiscal sponsor allowed" (Undefined: arrangement) | Sponsor unidentified | E1;missing sponsor | Unsupported | Clause preserved | Which sponsor and terms? |
Registry elapsed time is 3 years 6 months 5 days, not operating history. Awards fall 2000 USD and 20,000 USD below 50,000 USD separately;78,000 USD combined is not one award.
The owner reads the original call, resolves missing definitions and uses its stated funder-question channel. AI contacts nobody. This question method is original practice; Grants.gov concerns US federal opportunities only.