When to Use
Use this before a cash forecast discussion when order, receipt and payment lists overlap. The output is a planning explanation, not an accounting entry or liability decision.
Sort supplied purchasing facts into planning states and expose overlaps before a finance owner changes the forecast.
Use this before a cash forecast discussion when order, receipt and payment lists overlap. The output is a planning explanation, not an accounting entry or liability decision.
Fictional October 31 USD list: L1 notebooks 900 paid; L2 projector 1,500 received and expressly unpaid; L3 banners 700 ordered but not received. L4 tables ordered for 1,200 have 600 received and expressly unpaid, leaving 600 ordered. The open-order list still shows 1,200 and the unpaid list shows 600: adding both overstates tables by 600. L5, a 300 courier invoice, lacks delivery and payment evidence, so its state is UNKNOWN.
Expected planning buckets: 900 paid, 2,100 received-but-unpaid, 1,300 ordered-not-received and 300 UNKNOWN; total distinct listed value 4,600. These are not cash dates or recognized balances. Recheck partial amounts and evidence before using the cash forecast.
Cash-versus-accrual and charity-control sources explain why timing, evidence and review differ. The four labels and split method are original practice, not source-mandated accounting rules.
Confirm each state has its named source fact; retain UNKNOWN where evidence is missing; recompute nonoverlapping totals; make no accounting entry from this draft.